N 3 (184) 2023. P. 99–103

MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF THE BEHAVIOR OF PESTICIDES IN SOIL AND ASSESSMENT OF THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF PESTICIDES ON THE HUMAN ORGANISM IN INDUSTRIAL CONDITIONS WHEN THEY ENTER GROUNDWATER

Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI 10.32782/2226-2008-2023-3-18

It is very important to carry out a risk assessment for the population in case of oral ingestion of active substances (DR) of pesticides with water.

Objective. Hygienic evaluation of the persistence of pesticides in the soil recommended for the protection of berry and melon crops and prediction of the risk of groundwater contamination by them.

Research materials and methods. Field studies, chromatographic method, mathematical modeling, calculation of SCI-GROW (screening of concentration in groundwater) and the risk of negative impact on the human body of the active substances due to leaching into the water (P). Results. DT50 indicators for phenhexamid and fludioxonil (Switch), glyphosate, spirodiclofen, abamectin less than 11 days (4th class), for fludioxonil (Kitch), cyprodinil within 11–30 days (3rd class), for boscalid, pyraclostrobin, pendimethalin, fluxapyroxad in the range of 33.26 – 53.92 (2nd class).

Conclusions. For all active substances the value of risk the dangerous effect of pesticides on humans in case of their possible leaching from the soil into groundwater is acceptable.

Key words: chemical pollution, water, soil, risk, berries.

REFERENCES

  1. On the Key Principles (Strategy) of the State Environmental Policy of Ukraine for the Period till 2030, February 28, 2019, № 2697-VIII. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2697-19#Text.
  2. Ivanova LP, Adamchuk TV, Hrynko AP, Kravchuk OP, Petrashenko HI. Analysis of international approaches to regulation of pesticides in processed agricultural products. “One Health and Nutrition Problems of Ukraine”.2021; 2 (55): 94-99 (in Ukrainian).
  3. Antonenko AM, Vavrinevych OP, Omelchuk ST, Bardov V.H., Borysenko A.A. Hygienic grounds for selection criteria for pesticide detection in agricultural commodities, food products and soil (example for fungicides). “Actual problems of modern medicine: Bulletin of Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy”.3 (67) (2019): 104-108. (in Ukrainian).
  4. Antonenko АM, Borysenko AA, Omelchuk ST, Pelo IM, Babienko VV. Hygienic assessment of the pesticides migration in soil and surface water after agricultures processing using innovative technologies and revealing of the risk of their negative impact on human health. Odesa Medical Journal. 2023;2:84-87 (in Ukrainian) DOI: https://doi. org/10.32782/2226-2008-2023-2-15
  5. Graiet I, Hamdi H, Abid-Essefi S, Eyer J. Fludioxonil, a phenylpyrrol pesticide, induces Cytoskeleton disruption, DNA damage and apoptosis via oxidative stress on rat glioma cells. Food Chem Toxicol. 2022 Dec; 170:113464. doi: 10.1016/j. fct.2022.113464. Epub 2022 Oct 11. PMID: 36228901.
  6. Toğay VA, Yavuz Türel G, Aşcı Çelik D, Özgöçmen M, Evgen Tülüceoğlu E, Şen İ, Ayvaz Y. DNA damage effect of cyprodinil and thiacloprid in adult zebrafish gills. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar; 28(12):14482-14487. doi: 10.1007/ s11356-020-11668-1. Epub 2020 Nov 19. PMID: 33211291.
  7. Celik-Ozenci C, Tasatargil A, Tekcan M, Sati L, Gungor E, Isbir M, Usta MF, Akar ME, Erler F. Effect of abamectin exposure on semen parameters indicative of reduced sperm maturity: a study on farmworkers in Antalya (Turkey). Andrologia. 2012 Dec;44(6):388-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2012.01297.x. Epub 2012 Apr 24. PMID: 22530723.
  8. Generic guidance for Estimating Persistence and Degradation Kinetics from Environmental Fate Studies on Pesticides in EU Registration. (2011) / EU. Available from: https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/public_path/projects_data/focus/dk/docs/ FOCUSkineticsvc_1_0_Nov23.pdf.
  9. Cohen S. Recent examples of pesticide assessment and regulation under FQPA. Agricultural chemical news. (2000): 41–43.
  10. Initial Tier Screening of Pesticides for Ground Water Concentrations Using the SCI-GROW Model/ЕРА. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/#scigrow.
  11. SCI-GROW (Screening Concentration In GROund Water) / Water Models / Pesticides: Science and Policy/US ЕРА. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/index.htm#scigrow.
  12. Hihiienichna klasyfikatsiia pestytsydiv za stupenem nebezpechnosti: DSanPiN 8.8.1.002-98 [Hygienic Classification of Pesticides by Hazard DSanPiN 8.8.1.002-98]. Kyiv; 1998: 20 p. (in Ukrainian).
  13. PPDB: Pesticide Properties Data Base. Available from: http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/footprint/en/.
  14. Avtorskyi paket MedStat v. 5.2 Liakh Yu.Ie., Hurianov VH, 2003–2019 rr.
  15. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2013; 48(3): 452–458. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244
  16. Vavrinevych OP, Antonenko AM, Omelchuk ST, Korshun MM, inventors; Bogomolets National Medical University, assignee. [A method of comprehensive assessment of the risk of adverse effects of pesticides on the human body by being washed into water]. Patent Ukraine 105429, MPK A61V 10/00. 2016 March 25 (in Ukrainian).