N 2 (199) 2026. P. 75–80

THE IMPACT OF REGIONAL ANALGESIA ON PAIN INTENSITY AND CORTISOLEMIA LEVELS IN WOUNDED PATIENTS WITH COMBAT TRAUMA OF THE EXTREMITIES

Odesa National Medical University, Odesa, Ukraine
Military Medical Clinical Center of the Southern Region, Odesa, Ukraine

DOI 10.32782/2226-2008-2026-2-11

Introduction. There is uncertainty of evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of regional analgesic blocks during emergency care for wounded patients with combat trauma of the extremities at Role 2 medical treatment facilities and during interhospital transportation.

Objective. To optimize perioperative analgesia regimens for wounded patients with combat trauma of the extremities at Role 2 medical treatment facilities and during interhospital transportation based on a comparative assessment of the impact of regional or systemic analgesia on pain intensity and cortisolemia levels over time.

Materials and Methods. A prospective study included 100 patients with isolated combat trauma of one extremity. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 50) received systemic analgesia only, while Group 2 (n = 50) received ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Pain intensity was assessed over time using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), additionally the level of cortisol in plasma was also measured. Study parameters were registered in four stages: 1st stage – at the time of admission to the Role 2 medical treatment facilities; 2nd stage – at the completion of surgical intervention; 3rd stage – at the beginning of interhospital transportation; 4th stage – at the completion of interhospital transportation.

Results. Between the 1st and 2nd stages, both groups demonstrated significant changes in VAS and Cortisol levels (p < 0.05, respectively). At the 2nd stage, a significant intergroup difference was observed for VAS 2 (p < 0.05), whereas Cortisol 2 levels did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.17). Between the 2nd and 3rd stages, Group 1 showed significant changes in both VAS and Cortisol values (p < 0.05 respectively), while in Group 2 no significant change in VAS was observed (p = 0.11), despite a significant change in Cortisol levels (p < 0.05). At the 3rd stage, intergroup differences remained significant for VAS 3 (p < 0.05), with no significant difference in Cortisol 3 levels (p = 0.41). Between the 3rd and 4th stages, significant changes in VAS and Cortisol were observed only in Group 1 (p > 0.05 respectively), whereas no significant changes were detected in Group 2 (p = 0.07 and p = 0.38 respectively). At the 4th stage, significant intergroup differences were found for both VAS 4 and Cortisol 4 (p < 0.05 respectively).

Conclusions. The study results confirm that optimizing perioperative analgesia regimens at Role 2 medical treatment facilities and during interhospital transportation allows for minimizing systemic stress response manifestations, significantly improving treatment outcomes for wounded patients, and remains a priority task of modern military medicine.

Keywords: combat trauma, gunshot wound, gunshot injury, regional anesthesia, pain.

REFERENCES

  1. Burianov OA, Yarmoliuk YO, Derkach SO, et al. Optymizatsiia systemy likuvannia postrazhdalykh iz vohnepalnymy perelomamy dovhykh kistok [Optimization of the treatment system for casualties with gunshot fractures of long bones]. Travma. 2023;24(3):46–52 (In Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.22141/1608-1706.3.24.2023.953.
  2. Badiuk MI, Zhupan BB, Soliaryk VV, Kovyda DV. Optymizatsiia likuvalno-evakuatsiinoho zabezpechennia viiskovykh chastyn Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy operatyvno-taktychnoho rivnia v umovakh antyterorystychnoi operatsii [Optimization of medical and evacuation support of military units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine of operational-tactical level in the conditions of anti-terrorist operation]. Viisk Med Ukrainy. 2015;1(15):11–15 (In Ukrainian). Available from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/ UJRN/vmuk_2015_15_1_4.
  3. Kuchyn IL, Posternak HI, Govsieiev DO, Gybalo RV. Factors that influence the negative results of treatment of combatants’ pain after mine-blast wounds during the war in Ukraine. Clin Prev Med. 2023;5:34–41. https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868. 5.2023.05.
  4. Kuchyn I, Horoshko V. Chronic pain in patients with gunshot wounds. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023;23(1):47. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s12871-023-02005-3.
  5. Tharp WG, Breidenstein MW, Friend AF, Bender SP, Raftery D. The neuroendocrine stress response compensates for suppression of insulin secretion by volatile anesthetic agents: An observational study. Physiol Rep. 2023;11(4):e15603. https:// doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15603.
  6. Ismail S, Ahmed A, Hoda MQ, Asghar S, Habib A, Aziz A. Mid-axillary transversus abdominis plane block and stress response after abdominal hysterectomy: A randomized controlled placebo trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021;38(7):768–776. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001413.
  7. Bisschop PH, de Rooij SE, Zwinderman AH, et al. Cortisol, insulin, and glucose and the risk of delirium in older adults with hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(9):1692–1696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03575.x.
  8. Mohammed HSE, Ramadan HK, El-Mahdy RI, Ahmed EH, Hosni A, Mokhtar AA. The Prognostic Value of Different Levels of Cortisol and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein in Early Acute Pancreatitis. Am J Med Sci. 2022;363(5):435–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2021.09.014.
  9. Frank M, Kuchyn I, Bielka K, Klys Y, Shukurlu I. Optional sedation during surgical treatment of combat-related limb injury under regionalanaesthesia: anobservationalcohortstudy. BMJMil Health. 2025;171(2):military-2025-003018. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/military-2025-003018.
  10. Strokan AM, Dmytriiev DV, Khomenko AM. From battlefield to chronic pain: risk factors after combat-related extremity injuries – a multicenter cohort study. Clin Prev Med. 2026;1:41–47. https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.1.2026.05.
  11. Laitselart P, Hellander S, Josse F, et al. Regional anaesthesia in combat settings: a position paper from military physicians. BMJ Mil Health. 2025;171(2):military-2025-002988. https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2025-002988.
  12. Carness JM, Wilson MA, Lenart MJ, Smith DE, Dukes SF. Experience with Regional Anesthesia for Analgesia During Prolonged Aeromedical Evacuation. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017;88(8):768–772. https://doi.org/10.3357/ AMHP.4760.2017.
  13. McKendrick M, Sadler A, Taylor A, et al. The effect of an ultrasound-activated needle tip tracker needle on the performance of sciatic nerve block on a soft embalmed Thiel cadaver. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(2):209–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/ anae.15211.
  14. Moshkivskyi VM, Larionov VV. Anesteziolohichne zabezpechennia rekonstruktyvno-plastychnykh operatsii pry polistrukturnii vohnepalnii travmi peredplichchia ta kysti [Anesthesiologic management of reconstructive and plastic surgeries for polystructural gunshot injury of the forearm and hand]. Ukr Zh Viiskovoi Med. 2023;1(4):94–103 (In Ukrainian). https:// doi.org/10.46847/ujmm.2023.1(4)-094.
  15. Battlefield Advanced Trauma Life Support (BATLS). J R Army Med Corps. 2001;147(3):314–321. https://doi.org/10.1136/ jramc-147-03-12.