N 2 (187) 2024. P. 35–39

LOCAL APPLICATION OF A NEW HYGIENE AGENT FOR PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF POST-IMPLANTATION INFLAMMATORY COMPLICATIONS

O. V. Pasechnyk, A. O. Asmolova, A. M. Pasechnyk, M. V. Rozumenko

Odesa National Medical University, Odesa, Ukraine

DOI 10.32782/2226-2008-2024-2-6

Introduction. Dental implantation is widely developed in modern medicine. In order to obtain an early positive result of dental implantation, it is necessary to study and prevent early post-implantation inflammatory complications by means of local application of a new hygienic product – Apiprol dental elixir.

The aim of research is to study the changes in inflammatory reactions in the oral cavity with the local application of the new hygiene agent at the early postoperative period of dental implantation.

Material and methods. 28 patients (15 women and 13 men) with partial secondary adentia aged 32 to 60 years who underwent dental implantation.

The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed by clinical and laboratory (biochemical, microbiological, immunological) examinations.

Results. The results showed that at the early postoperative stage of dental implantation in both study groups (with the local application of the new dental elixir and with the traditional use of herbal tinctures), local inflammatory processes occur in the tissues surrounding the implantation zone. At the early post-implantation period, the new dental elixir has a positive effect on the hygiene and microbiological status of the oral cavity decreasing the hygienic index on average from 3.8 to 0.5, quickly reduces the severity of edema and hyperemia of the periimplant tissues with pain relief (on the 6th day in 91.6 % versus 72,9% in comparison group). At the early post-implantation stage, the dental elixir improves oral condition, inhibits free radical oxidation, activates enzyme components of antioxidant defenсe, which creates the basis for rapid recovery of peri-implant tissues compared to traditional local therapy.

Conclusion. The occurrence of early postoperative complications during dental implantation is reduced by local application of the dental elixir to the peri-implantation area during the first ten days of the post-implantation period.

Key words: dental implantation, oral fluid, markers of inflammation, dental elixir.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

  1. Otazhonova HI, Habibullaev IA. Study of the problem of periimplantation development due to the presence of certain factors. Educational Research in Universal Sciences (ERUS). 2023; 2(5): 212–214. http://erus.uz/index.php/er/article/view/3/14 (in Ukrainian).
  2. Buser D, Cho JY, Yco AB. Surgical Manual of Implant Dentistry. Step-By-Step Procedures. Quntessence Publishing. 2020; 297 p.
  3. Clementini M, Rossetti PH, Penarroch D. Systemic risk factors for peri-implant bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 2014; 43: 323–334.
  4. Rodrigues DC. Etiology of peri-implant diseases. Dental implant failure. 2019; 49–59.
  5. Konnov SV. Complex of preventive measures to minimize complications in the postoperative period during dental implantation. Bulletin of medical Internet conferences. 2017; 7(9): 1401–1406. ID: 2017-09-5-Д 12126 (in Ukrainian).
  6. Kravchenko LS, Appelhans OL, Ivanova YI, Goncharenko OV. Dental elixir for local prevention and treatment of inflammatory processes of the mucous membrane of the oral cavity and periodontal tissues. Patent for the invention No. 122996; applicant and patent owner ONMedU. 202002339 dated 04/10/2020, publ. 27.01.2021, Bull. No. 4 (in Ukrainian).
  7. Levitsky AP. Lysozyme instead of antibiotics. Odesa, KPOGT, 2005, 74 p. (in Ukrainian).
  8. Levitsky AP. Enzymatic method of determining oral dysbiosis for screening proprebiotics: Methodical recommendations. Kyiv, 2007, 20 p. (in Ukrainian).
  9. Horyachkovsky AM. Clinical biochemistry in laboratory diagnostics. 3rd ed. Odesa, Ecology, 2005, 616 p. (in Ukrainian).
  10. Schrader C, Schielke A, Ellerbroek L, Johne R. PCR inhibitors-occurrence, properties and removal. Journal of applied microbiology. 2012; 113(5): 1014–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05384.x.
  11. Patil S, Rao RS, Amrutha N, Sanketh DS. Oral microbial flora in health. World J Dent. 2013; 4: 262–6. doi: 10.5005/ jp-journals-10024-1477.
  12. Ata-Ali J. Clinical, microbiological and immunological aspects of healthy versus peri-implantitis tissue in full arch reconstruction patients: a prospective cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2015; 1(15): 43. doi: 10.1186/ S12903-015-0031-9.
  13. Dalago HR Risk indicators for Peri-implantitis. Across-Sectional study with 916 implants. Oral. Implant Res. 2016; 1: 11. doi: 101111/clr. 12772.
  14. Rozhko PD, Rozumenko MV. Effectiveness of therapeutic and preventive measures in the modeling of diabetes in rats and installation of implants. Odesa Medical Journal. 2022; 3: 17–20. doi: 10.32782/2226-2008-2022-3-3 (in Ukrainian).
  15. Park SY. An immediate peri-implantitis induction model to study regenerative peri-implantitis treatments SY Park. Oral. Implant Res. 2015; 5: 9. doi: 10.1111/clr.12611.
  16. Frolov AA. Problems of dental implantation. Scientific leader. 2021; 14: 6. Available at: https://scilead.ru/article/332-problemi-dentalnoj-implantatsii.
  17. Lepylin AV, Zakharova, NB, Shalyna, MYu, Fishchev SB, Sevastyanov AV. Prevention of inflammatory complications during immediate dental implantation surgery. Periodontology. 2019; 24(3): 236–242. doi: 10.33925/1683-3759-2019-24-3-236-242 (in Ukrainian).
View article PDF