However, the idea of a “noosphere” of Teilhard de Chardin is perceived by some today, it was a concept that did not gain ground, although it had its eminent champions such as Huxley, Lerua and Vernadsky. The notion of de Chardin was too ephemeral a concept to take on board, especially with its spiritual basis that did not fit with scientific thinking. This underlying idea, however, did help us nevertheless to focus on a newly emerging era in evolution, one that would change the direction in which “natural” forces might have led us. It has become increasingly obvious that this new direction could be largely under human control and this could impact many different ways on the future of planet Earth (and probably beyond). As a wake-up call, the noosphere was therefore important in one respect, which emphasised the fact that man must set about regulating the “knowledge-sphere” and taking greater responsibility for his action in the evolutionary process, i.e. in the behaviour through which he applies this knowledge. Little seems to have been done constructively about this matter, but the knowledge-sphere is now with us in the guise of the internet and other media systems that could never have been perceived by the 20th advocates of the noosphere concept. Evolutionary development has to be considered in much greater depth because it is hereafter going to be central to any debate about the future. It follows that the problems of what constitutes useful knowledge and how to control of its application have become increasingly urgent, otherwise possible scenarios would include some that would definitely be detrimental to future existence of mankind, as was faced when atomic warfare was first let loose. The wake-up call today should not be through such drastic measures. The general public is greatly in need of education about the issues facing mankind and the planet. Concerted action on a global scale is needed to put in place constructive approaches, bottom-up and top-down, that might help human society, the biosphere, and our planet (and things beyond) to face the future with confidence and understanding. It is hoped that what is presented here goes some way to opening up a fuller debate of an underlying deficiency in the present state relating to our control of human knowledge and where it might take us, rather than proferring solution to the problems.
